Analysis of Flavonoids TLC Methods
Antiquity, paper chromatography is widely used for the
analysis of flavonoids, but now more methods of analysis that is simple and
inexpensive Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC / TLC). TLC's advantages are:
• The process of separation of compounds that are relatively short.
• Method detection reagents enough to spray.
• Can be analyzed in several samples at the same time.
• The process of separation of compounds that are relatively short.
• Method detection reagents enough to spray.
• Can be analyzed in several samples at the same time.
TLC is suitable for initial orientation analysis of plant
extracts before continuing to other analysis tools instruments such as HPLC,
GC, etc..
Flavonoids have two benzene rings separated by propane
and is a derivative of flavone. In general,
water-soluble flavonoid compounds. The more
brightly colored the conjugated compound. In
the plants, flavonoid commonly found in the form of glycosides. The
difference in the classification of flavonoids shown by the addition of oxygen,
a heterocyclic ring and hydroxyl groups. These
groups include catechins, leucoanthocyanidin, flavanones, flavanonol, flavones,
anthocyanidins, flavonols, Chalcone, aurone and isoflavones.
There are many kinds of systems solvent / eluent used for
the separation of flavonoids using TLC. One
example of the results of the methylation or acetylation of flavones and
flavonols require nonpolar solvents such as chloroform-methanol (15:1). Being
such flavonoid aglycone apigenin, luteolin and quercetin can be separated with
chloroform methanol (96:4) or with the same polarity. In
general, the mobile phase TLC for flavonoid glycosides is ethyl acetate -
formic acid - glacial acetic acid - water (100:11:11:26). If
the addition of methyl ethyl ketone (ethyl acetate-methyl ethyl ketone-formic
acid-glacial aseta acid - water (50:30:7:3:10), rutin and
vitexin-2''-O-ramnosida be separated.
With regard to detection, flavonoids spot on TLC plates
produce a yellow-brown spots white background when reacted with iodine vapor.
Flavonoids may appear as dark spots on a green background
fluoresce when observed in UV light at 254 nm UV-plates containing fluorescent
indicator (such as silica gel F254). If
under 365 nm UV light, spot colors depending on the structure of flavonoids,
can be yellow, green or blue fluorescent. It
would be more clear and intense after being sprayed with the reagent.
Colors can be observed at 365 nm UV light are as follows:
•
Quercetin, myricetin, and 3 & 7-O-glycosides: orange-yellow
•
kaempferol, isorhamnetin, and 3 & 7-O-glycosides: yellow-green
• Luteolin and
7-O-glycosides: orange
• Apigenin and
7-O-glycosides: yellow-green
Further details regarding the use of reagents natural
material products can be seen diartikel Brasseur and Angenot, 1986, p 351.
Ferric chloride in water or ethanol is generally
apparition spot on analysis of phenolic compounds will provide a blue-black
color on the detection of flavonoids. Similarly,
Fast Blue Salt B form a blue or blue-purple.
Here is a list of TLC eluent for the separation of
flavonoids on silica gel stationary phase:
Sampel
|
Eluen
|
Flavonoid aglycon
|
EtOAc–Isopropanol–H2O,
100:17:13
EtOAc–
Chloroform, 60:40
Chloroform–MeOH,
96:4
Toluene– Chloroform
–MeCOMe, 8:5:7
Toluene–HCOOEt–HCOOH,
5:4:1
Toluene–EtOAc–HCOOH,
10:4:1
Toluene–EtOAc–HCOOH,
58:33:9
Toluene–EtCOMe–HCOOH,
18:5:1
Toluene–dioxane–HOAc,
90:25:4
|
Flavonoid glycoside
|
n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O,
65:15:25
n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O,
3:1:1
EtOAc–MeOH–H2O,
50:3:10
EtOAc–MeOH–HCOOH–H2O,
50:2:3:6
EtOAc–EtOH–HCOOH–H2O,
100:11:11:26
EtOAc–HCOOH–H2O,
9:1:1
EtOAc–HCOOH–H2O,
6:1:1
EtOAc–HCOOH–H2O,
50:4:10
EtOAc–HCOOH–HOAc–H2O,
100:11:11:26
EtOAc–HCOOH–HOAc–H2O,
25:2:2:4
THF–toluene–HCOOH–H2O,
16:8:2:1
Chloroform
–MeCOMe–HCOOH, 50:33:17
Chloroform
–EtOAc–MeCOMe, 5:1:4
Chloroform
–MeOH–H2O, 65:45:12
Chloroform
–MeOH–H2O, 40:10:1
MeCOMe–butanone–HCOOH,
10:7:1
MeOH–butanone–H2O,
8:1:1
|
Flavonoid glucuronide
|
EtOAc–Et2O–dioxane–HCOOH–H2O,
30:50:15:3:2
EtOAc–EtCOMe–HCOOH–H2O,
60:35:3:2
|
Flavanone aglycone
|
CH2Cl2–HOAc–H2O,
2:1:1
|
Flavanone glycoside
|
Chloroform
–HOAc, 100:4
Chloroform
–MeOH–HOAc, 90:5:5
n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O,
4:1:5 (upper layer)
Chalcones
EtOAc–hexane, 1:1
Isoflavones
CHCl3–MeOH, 92:8
Chloroform
–MeOH, 3:1
|
Isoflavone glycoside
|
n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O,
4:1:5 (upper layer)
|
Dihydroflavonol
|
Chloroform
–MeOH–HOAc, 7:1:1
|
Biflavonoid
|
Chloroform
–MeCOMe–HCOOH, 75:16.5:8.5
Toluene–HCOOEt–HCOOH,
5:4:1
|
Anthocyanidin
dan anthocyanin
|
EtOAc–HCOOH–2
M HCl, 85:6:9
n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O,
4:1:2
EtCOMe–HCOOEt–HCOOH–H2O,
4:3:1:2
EtOAc–butanone–HCOOH–H2O,
6:3:1:1
|
Proanthocyanidin
|
EtOAc–MeOH–H2O,
79:11:10
EtOAc–HCOOH–HOAc–H2O,
30:1.2:0.8:8
|
results of methylation or acetylation of flavones and flavonols require nonpolar solvents such as chloroform-methanol (15:1). Being such flavonoid aglycone apigenin, luteolin and quercetin can be separated with chloroform methanol (96:4) or with the same polarity.
BalasHapuswhy the results of methylation or acetylation of flavones and flavonols require nonpolar solvents in separation? then why comparisons chloroform-methanol used in the separation of flavonoid aglycone greater than the flavones and flavonols methylation results?
Reference please
BalasHapus